Quintin Jardine's blog

The retail equivalent of a Great White?

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/bookselling/article/49815-amazon-backlash-continues-to-build.html

How about this for wisdom, from President Sarko and his friend?

“Never have so many countries wanted to join Europe. Never has the risk of a disintegration of Europe been so great. Europe is facing an extraordinarily dangerous situation.”

He said the eurozone economies still had a few weeks to decide, but that time was working against them.

“The diagnosis is that we have a few weeks to decide because time is working against us. If we aren’t in agreement on this, I fear that we won’t be able to agree on anything. That’s the analysis.”

Mrs Merkel has said changes to the European basic treaty are necessary. She said all 27 member states in the EU had a duty to Europe, and had to work together to overcome the crisis in the eurozone.

National egos and interests had to be put aside, she added.

Those would be national egos with the exception of the French and the Germans, then? Both Sarkozy and Merkel are facing elections very soon. Are they playing to the European gallery, or their own, just as Dave Cameron has gone to the Marseille  conference with his card well marked by his own back benches?

1. BREAKING NEWS

   The A9 has been closed in both directions – northbound from Dunkeld and southbound from Killiecrankie – as a result of falling trees. Tayside Police has shut the northbound carriageway at Inveralmond to prevent further traffic from accessing the road, and is in discussions with neighbouring forces about southbound traffic. Several hundred vehicles are believed to be on the road and efforts are under way to inform motorists about the situation.

This is currently on the Lothian and Borders police website.

Due to the current severe weather conditions being experienced, the following Police Stations in West Lothian will be closed to members of the public from 1330hrs today:

• Linlithgow
• Whitburn
• Armadale
• West Calder

I’m a supporter of an excellent e-zine, The Scottish Review, published by Kenneth Roy, a very distinguished Scot, and a contemporary of mine. It’s always a good read, but today, Kenneth has excelled himself.

http://www.scottishreview.net/index.shtml?utm_source=Sign-Up.to&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=255431-Named%3A+Scotland%27s+gold-plated+public+pensioners

Dunno about you, but I have a real aversion to the ‘Quickquid’ type ads that are becoming more and more prevalent on our commercial telly. I accept that a short-term loan facility that’s easier to arrange than a conventional bank overdraft can be attractive to folk who are cash-strapped, or whose employers are casual about wage deadlines. (Hearts footballers come to mind.) However my dislike of the burgeoning Consumer Finance Industry comes from my perverse insistence on reading the small print. When I do, I discover that these payday loans carry interest that can run up to an APR of 4000%. On top of that most of them seem to carry an arrangement fee. In other words if you borrow say £500 to tide you over till payday, you don’t actually get £500, but that amount less the company’s charge . . . which, you can bet, will be additional to the accruing interest. There are dozens of these operators around, throwing money at people who are either under too much pressure to consider the implications, or are simply soft touches for the brash TV commercials, populated by flash geezers and smiling women with dead eyes.

The Citizens’ Advice Bureau has its eye on the situation, and has asked the government to tighten regulation of a business that’s now turning over £2bn annually, according to estimates. The Consumer Minister’s response is that such a step could push people towards illegal moneylenders. This is the same minister whose government is presiding over a situation that has allowed the Santander bank, and no doubt others, to impose overdraft charges that can, according to a report I read at the weekend, run to the equivalent of an APR of 800,000%! Tell you what, Dave and Nick, how about raising the tax threshold by 50%, so that lower earners can hang on to enough of their salaries to see them through the month, in the face of uncontrolled rip-offs like escalating energy bills and transport costs. Seems to me that Westminster is the friend of rapacious banks, utility and petrol companies, and by association the enemy of the people it exists to serve.

In my eyes, the Consumer Finance Industry is yet another symptom of a diseased society, alongside inner city riots, irresponsible strikes, and rampant political correctness that all too often overrides common sense. As a United Kingdom, we’re suffering from the weak government that a coalition inevitably brings, with the further complication of an even weaker Official Opposition, under a leader who is the biggest gift to the Tory Party since Michael Foot. Is it any wonder that more and more Scots are crying out for independence, as I am?

Welcome back, Tiger. Okay, you only beat seventeen other guys on a course you know like the back of your hand, but the game needs you, as a benchmark for the young guys and for the ‘gasp’ factor in everything you do.

Quite a few, and every one a smartarse. Yes, (he sighed) I know; in rural France, Hotel de Ville equals Town Hall, but I’m quirky and like to set these traps.

Yes, Jeremy Clarkson is an arse, but he works for the BBC. The Corporation above all should have known as much, and that when they stuck him in front of a camera and allowed its presenters to invite him to outline his views on public service strikers, they need not expect the response to be politically correct. Therefore the producers of The One Show are every bit as much to blame for the offence that his ill-expressed humour undoubtedly caused as is the man who uttered it. The same unit has an unfortunate record of walking away from controversy caused by the show’s guests, for example in the case of Carol Thatcher, who was vilified and cast out for a private remark in case it blew back on the programme director.

If he had been appearing on Question Time, with an intelligent chair rather than airheads, a sophisticated audience that knows irony when it hears it, and robust fellow panellists to take up the challenge Clarkson threw out, it would have made good television; it might have attracted a few comments on Points of View, but that would have been it.

In the aftermath, in my humble, anyone who interprets his remarks as anything other than totally hyperbolic is an even bigger idiot than Jeremy himself . . . only Jeremy isn’t, not by a long shot.

Q. Why was he on The One Show in the first place?

A. To plug his new DVD.

Q. Will his sales suffer because of all the nonsense?

A. Don’t be daft; Jeremy isn’t.

I heard a story today; true, but definitely no names, locations etc, and no pack drill. There’s this person who’s employed by an English local authority to do a certain job. Okay. As we all know, councils are under pressure to show economies, staff cuts etc. Suddenly, out of the blue, this person finds out that the job is being ‘out-sourced’, to use the buzz phrase. The person continues in the same role, but now has a private sector employer . . . a firm set up by the son of a member of the council that took the ‘outsourcing’ decision. The difference for the employee is that where the salary payments from the local authority always hit the bank on the due date, now they are regularly delayed, with all the potentially disastrous consequences for people managing a tight family budget, with mortgage and utility payments that can’t be delayed and the threat of crippling overdraft costs.

My first thought when I heard this? What Would the News of the World have done in its heyday with a story like that?

I have sympathy with the people who are on strike in Britain today. There are one of two exceptions, though; for example the tosser with the scarf who was interviewed on BBC Scotland this morning, trotting out the old learned-by-rote claptrap. His name was John something and he was billed as ‘Student’. Student? Then what the pluperfect **** was he doing there? What bloody right had be to present himself as a spokesman for people who have actually done a day’s work in their lives, and who have real, personal concerns about their long-term futures, and what idiot in the BBC news production  team decided to put him on air?

That’s an aside, though. Public sector pensions are an area of interest to me, not least because I have one. I spent the 1970s in an off-shoot of the civil service, and accrued pension rights, non-contributory incidentally, for all that time. When I came to collect, I had done some calculations on what I might be due, but when my award came through it was well below my estimate. I queried it and received a letter from some junior clerk that was full of mumbo-jumbo and way short of the actuarial calculation to which I should have been entitled. I was left with no further redress and a continuing feeling, which persists to this day that I’ve been cheated. So yes, those people who are out there marching are right to make their points about entitlement now, and I’m behind them on that.

But what are they gaining by taking a day off work? What are they gaining by stealing a day’s education from children, and by inconveniencing their parents? What are they gaining by pissing off someone like me, a supporter, because my wheelie bin hasn’t been emptied this morning? Or pissing off my step-daughter, another sympathiser, who’s flying into Stansted this evening facing the likelihood of massive delays at passport control, that will probably cost her the difference between a rail fare and a taxi fare back into London? What exactly is the sense in all of that?

The last industrial action on this scale gave Margaret Thatcher the excuse and the ammunition to emasculate the trade union movement. What will be the consequences of this one?

I’ve just read a story my morning newspaper of a proposal (the story didn’t make clear who was its author) that drivers should give up their licences at 70, or at the least that there should be compulsory re-testing on age grounds.

I’d find the former suggestion risible if it wasn’t downright offensive, but I can’t argue against the latter. In North Berwick yesterday morning I saw two young drivers, their cars within the safe braking distance, drive over the top of a mini roundabout, as they made a right turn. Reckless, but not untypical. Yes, there should be compulsory re-testing, just as there is for vehicles. After all, almost invariably it’s the driver who kills, not  the car. But which drivers? On a US trip a few years ago, I was struck by the fact that the Monday morning news bulletins were headed by round-ups of weekend road fatalities, state-wide. Almost all the dead drivers were said tio have been twenty-one or under. I would love to see an analysis in the UK of the average age of drivers found to be culpable in serious and fatal road accidents; I’ll bet that it would be lower than 35.

So here’s my proposal. Drivers aged under twenty-one should be re-tested one year after gaining a full licence, and every three years thereafter, until they reach the age of twenty-five. Twenty-five to forty-five, we should be re-tested every five years, forty-five to seventy-five every ten, and every three years thereafter. Drivers over seventy-five should also require medical certification by a doctor other than their own GP.

You want to keep death off the roads? Start at the lover end of the age scale, and work up.

We’ve just had a family of eleven  magpies playing in our garden. How high up the lucky scale is that?

I am a keen supporter of Kenneth Roy’s highly entertaining internet magazine, The Scottish Review. Now I’m happy to be a contributor, and I’m posting this in the hope of attracting more readers to an excellent and worthy Scottish publication.

http://www.scottishreview.net/QuintinJardine199.shtml

A trawl through recent issues will explain the background, a classic example of two people conducting an intellectual debate in a phone box, in terms that would fit nicely into Private Eye‘s ‘Pseuds’ Corner’ any day of the week.

This week Primavera 4 will be delivered to my editor. Next week, I plan to start on Skinner 23. Game plan, finish it by end February then head for somewhere warm on holiday.

I’m intrigued by David Beckham’s current hair style. Is he trying to become Ricky Gervais?

Last Friday I had the pleasure of sharing a platform at the awkwardly named Reading Crime Writing Festival, with my good friend of 30 years, Michael Dobbs. Arriving a few hours before the event, I took a walk around the town centre, to check out the lie of the land, and also to check out the local bookshops, as is my wont. Yes, Waterstone’s was there, I was pleased to see, although that was to be expected still, in the heart of such a large community. Mind you, it wasn’t exactly awash with customers, and not far away I found the empty shell of what had been until recently British Book Shops, the big W’s regional rival. I visited the head office of that chain, and several of its stores, last year. I found a bustling, management-owned, go-ahead company with lots of good ideas, very similar to Ottakar’s, Borders UK and even Waterstone’s itself, in their formative years. Yet little more than twelve months later it has followed two of those three into liquidation.

So what’s the cause? The economic downturn? It can’t have helped, but I’ve heard of anecdotal evidence that when times are tough, people read more. Internet shopping? No doubt about it. In the face of the explosive expansion of Amazon, traditional book stores are under the sort of pressure they’ve never experienced and never anticipated. If they had, they’d have adapted, and set up their own web sales operations well in advance, rather than staring wanly after the bolted horse. Supermarkets? Mightily, and in a way they are more damaging to readers, writers and publishers than Amazon, for they focus almost entirely on hot titles and authors, screwing big stock discounts from  their suppliers, with no interest at all in back list titles. E-books? Perhaps not yet as much as is suggested, but they will impact more and more for sure, given the way that Amazon is pushing its customers towards digital versions as fast as it can, and offering direct access to established and would-be authors with not a sign of quality control. As before, the retail trade has reacted to this rather than anticipating; Sony, the Barnes & Noble Nook in the US, and the Kobo, internationally, are out there, and Waterstone’s are promising their own product, but in the face of the massive marketing campaign that is being thrown behind the Amazon Kindle, most of these formats will be left floundering.

There is a case for suggesting that authors, and possibly publishers, should be all for e-books. They offer instant accessibility and they have minimal production costs, so they should be more profitable even at greatly discounted prices. They’re here and they’re unstoppable, but they are also a danger, if they’re pushed too far and too fast. The majority of people still read old-fashioned books, printed on paper, but with the traditional book retail market having been decimated, many of them are having to go further afield to buy, without any guarantee that when they get there, the titles they’re after will be in stock. If Waterstone’s goes, what will remain in Britain for buyers who want to choose from a broad range of printed books without having to go on line? WHS Smith, which despite its claim to be Britain’s biggest bookseller, is still more of a newsagent, stationer and sweet shop. A steadily diminishing number of independent book stores, subject to all the pressures I’ve listed, plus the added problem of the spread of well-intentioned but pernicious charity shops. Beyond that nothing.

The way things stand, you won’t find my entire back-list stocked in any High Street book shop in the UK. The same is true of any author whose titles run into double figures. I’m fortunate in that I have the asset of http://www.campbellreadbooks.com, where you will find all my titles, signed and post-free in the UK, postage subsidised elsewhere. However most of my colleagues, like it or loathe it, are having to rely on Amazon, which like most bottom-line businesses, has no soul and no conscience. I confess that I use the monster myself, a lot, for lifestyle reasons, and I accept that in principle it’s okay. However if it pursues a goal of total global market domination, it’s not, and the signs are that it’s doing just that. It has already faced one anti-trust suit in the US, and settled out of court before the case even got to proof stage. I wonder how many more will follow in America, and how long it will be before it falls foul of EU competition laws.

You’ve pretty much covered the lot, it seems. Funeral Note, the next Skinner will appear next June, but before then, in January, As Easy As Murder, the third Primavera, will hit the shops and websites.